

...
home
| art & architecture | books & cds | dance
| destinations | film | opera | television | theater | archives
...
Angel Eyes (2001)
Angel Eyes
is a film that can't seem to make up its mind. Is
it a romance? Suspense police drama? Supernatural thriller? It's never obvious, and the film plays its cards
maddeningly close to the vest throughout. For
most of its story numerous obtuse yet seemingly significant clues are grudgingly dispensed
and the audience is led to various dead ends. By
its conclusion it turns out to have been All Of The Above, not very good at any of them,
and the viewer is left with an overwhelming sense of "So what?"
Sharon Pogue (Jennifer Lopez) is a street-smart (is there any other
kind in the movies?) Chicago cop who's ambushed during a foot pursuit through an
inner-city neighborhood. Only the
last-minute appearance of a civilian thwarts the attack and saves her life. The civilian, a man who calls himself simply
"Catch" (Jim Caviezel) is a quiet and disheveled sort with no visible means of
support and reticent to reveal much about himself. Naturally,
Sharon is intrigued, even more so after her partner runs a police database search on Catch
and comes up empty he's a man without a past, or apparently even a present. She is intrigued enough to learn more and as she
gets closer becomes more attracted to him.
The next hour of the film is spent plodding through numerous
repetitions of the same basic scene. Sharon
learns a fragment of information about Catch and she confronts him. He reacts angrily, insists she doesnt
understand but doesnt want to explain more. She
says she's only asking because she cares and wants to know what he's so afraid about. This cycle is repeated ad nauseam, interspersed
with disjointed scenes of Sharon at work. Catch
is shown either stalking Sharon, wandering aimlessly through the city, delivering
groceries to a "mysterious" shut-in, or sitting in his large and very empty
apartment assembling IKEA furniture.
The
main problem is that after about three variations on this theme without any progress in
either the story or character development, there's little reason for anyone to care.
A couple of sub-plots are thrown in along the way
some are partially resolved, some disappear without a trace. Even within an
individual scene the film is fragmented, as characters will switch from love to anger to
indifference in nanoseconds without any apparent motivation. The entire film appears
to have been written, then chopped up and thrown in a bingo drum, the story constructed
based on what scene or line of dialog was pulled out next. The apparent intent was
for the film to have its details gradually filled in over time, but it's more like an
artist who does one quick sketch, then throws it out to start over on something completely
different.
Jennifer
Lopez plays Sharon as someone whose hidden past (another of those pesky and unsatisfying sub-plots) has made her tougher than she needs to
be. She manages to take the scattershot script and provide a small measure of
continuity via a restrained performance, but eventually the crazy-quilt story and dialog
require her to shift emotional gears once too often to remain believable. Jim
Caviezel seems to be trying to corner the market on unkempt and brooding earnestness, here
his Catch is merely the 2001 version of a character he's played often before in films like
The Thin Red Line and Pay
It Forward. He's supposed to be intriguing and mysterious but instead is a
vacant non-entity. Gertrude Stein's comment about Oakland ("There's no there there.") would readily apply.
The film eventually does make one good point that our lives are
made up of individual minutes, and we shouldnt waste any of them hiding the truth
about our feelings from the people we care about but that message is revealed much
too late in a Caviezel monologue that's intended to be poignant but instead turns cloying. Angel Eyes
is a romance without love, a suspense drama without tension, a thriller without
excitement.
- Bob Aulert