Save Up to 70% at the Online Private Sale


..
.home | art & architecture | books & cds | dance | destinations | film | opera | television | theater | archives


The Seagull
Anton Chekhov

New York: Shakespeare in Central Park
July 24 - August 26, 2001

seagullstreep.jpg (20433 bytes)
Meryl Streep, Kevin Kline

Amazonsmallbutton.gif (1048 bytes) Suggested reading:
the play
Anton Chekhov: A Life  (2000),  Donald Rayfield
The Cambridge Companion to Chekhov
(2000), Vera Gottlieb, editor

Anton Chekhov (Modern Critical Views)
(1998), Harold Bloom, editor

 

Russia: Land of the Tsars 2PK (DVD)
Russia: Land Of The Tsars  DVD
Russia: Land Of The Tsars  VHS

 

    If Chekhov were alive today to witness the hordes camped out overnight in Central Park for free tickets to the New York Shakespeare Festival’s star-studded production of The Seagull, he would be flabbergasted. After all, the play bombed when it was first produced in St. Petersburg, shortly after its first publication in March, 1896. Sadly, despite a cast and crew of experienced and talented artists, this production is not worth the wait.
    The play explores unrequited love through characters who ultimately never achieve their heart’s desire. The action opens on Sorin’s country estate in August. Near the lake at the edge of his property, his talented, but troubled, nephew Konstantin stages a play he has written. Konstantin's mother, Arkadina, a famous aging actress, has returned to the country for a visit and brought in tow her younger lover, Trigorin, a famous writer. In typical Oedipal fashion, Konstantin reveals his jealousy of Trigorin, not only for his success as a writer, but also for Arkadina’s infatuation with him and his success.
    Trigorin, meanwhile, falls for Konstantin’s love, Nina, a budding young actress and daughter of a wealthy landowner across the lake. She spurns Konstantin, follows Trigorin to Moscow and ruins her respectability by becoming his lover and bearing his child. Yet through her experiences, she discovers that endurance and faith are the most important elements of life. These help her continue acting. The emotionally fragile Konstantin, on the other hand, cannot bear his mother’s and finally Nina’s abandonment. The juxtaposition of the young couple, Nina and Konstantin, with the older couple, Arkadina and Trigorin, serves as the play’s emotional core.
    As Arkadina, Meryl Streep returns to the stage after a twenty-year absence and provides a rich, playful performance that recalls Margo Channing in All About Eve. Prancing, dancing, even cart-wheeling on stage, she creates the production’s most compelling and complicated character, magnanimous one moment, yet, in the blink of an eye, demanding and petulant as a school child. She seduces both Trigorin and the audience with her charm, sensuality and confidence.
    Kevin Kline, as Trigorin, gives the most natural performance. While he shies away from revealing Trigorin’s calculating nature, especially in his encounters with Nina, he is the most comfortable with his lines. They roll right off his tongue as if they were his, not Chekhov’s. Natalie Portman titters about the stage doll-like and full of naïve wonder. However, her portrait of Nina is too hollow to gain full sympathy.
    As Konstantin, Philip Seymour Hoffman reveals the character’s despair with passion and fury, yet they signify nothing. As he does not provide a balance to Konstantin’s brooding and depression, this character’s complexity does not come to life. In supporting roles, Stephen Spinella as Medvedenko the schoolteacher, Marcia Gay Harden as Masha, John Goodman as Shamrayev, and Debra Monk as Polina are wasted. Their subplots serve as little more than window dressing to the couples.
    Only Larry Pine’s performance as Dorn, the calm, perceptive doctor and voice of reason, rises above the others as a substantial anchor in the play. Christopher Walken provides comic relief as Sorin, the retired state councilor. Yet he hams it up too much for a sickly character supposedly near his deathbed. Walken’s performance is better suited for Saturday Night Live than Chekhov.
    Publicity for the play has touted that this production is a new version by Tom Stoppard. Upon inspecting Chekhov’s text, his input appears to consist mostly of pushing the delete key in long passages and updating the jokes for a modern audience. The polish so appreciated in Shakespeare in Love is not apparent here. Mike Nichols’ direction is flat and lacking drama. Each actor appears to be working alone, rather than coming together into a cohesive ensemble. Tensions never build and an emotional payoff never arrives.

    New York, August 19, 2001                                                                 - Susanna Horng