
...
home
| art & architecture | books & cds | dance
| destinations | film | opera | television | theater | archives
...
|
|
On the face of it, Arthur Dongs documentary,
Family Fundamentals, is the stirring saga of
three families confronted with homosexuality in their midst, and how they imperfectly, and
with wrenching results, confront the issue. But, in his analysis of the different sides to
the gay issue, and in the presentation of diverse viewpoints, Dong (Coming Out Under Fire, Licensed to Kill), who is
himself gay, is ultimately analyzing two diametrically opposing social movements: the
deeply conservative influences of organized religion and the individual rights obsession
of political liberalism.
Family Fundamentals trails
the "coming out" consequences for three gay people and the irreparable changes
that occur in their relationships with their close ones. The first is Susan Jester, the
lesbian daughter of Kathleen Bremmer, a Pentecostal church leader in San Diego. The
colliding positions of mother and daughter are immediately apparent. Susan is openly gay
and has taken an active role in the gay civil rights movement. Kathleen is one of the
organizers of the San Diego Christian Trauma and Sexuality conference that advocates
reparative therapy for homosexuality and has conducted monthly support group meetings for
parents with gay children. Kathleen is further troubled with the fact that Susans
son--her grandson--David Jester, is also gay.
The second case is Brett Mathews, a former First Lieutenant in the U.S.
Air Force who was discharged from the service because of his homosexuality. Although given
an honorable discharge, Mathews was stripped of his veterans benefits. His father is
a Mormon Bishop in Utah and a direct descendent of the original Mormon settlers of Tooele
County, Utah in the 1850s. When Brett returns home for his grandmothers remarriage,
a remarkable conflict is set to take place between the family, which maintains a prominent
religious and social role in its community, and the rebel son, who has wandered far astray
from the very tenets of his religion.
The family travails of Susan Jester and Brett Mathews highlight the
influence of Christian religion on attitudes towards homosexuality. Anti-gay advocates
cite the Bible to argue that Christ did not want men or women to fornicate with their own
kind. Any sexual association with members of the same sex is a sin and is pandering to the
devil. Pro-gay advocates argue that nowhere in the Bible is it stated that gay
relationships are acts of sin. Christs enduring message was about Love, and gay
activists argue that this message is lost in the current gay-hate rhetoric.
The political dimensions of this conflict are highlighted in the third
case, where Dong interviews Brian Bennett, who, from 1977 to 1989, was the Chief of Staff,
campaign manager, and legislative aide to former U.S. congressman Bob Dornan (Republican
elected from California). Paradoxically, Dornan is one of the most virulent anti-gay
advocates in the country. Dornan was a father figure to Bennett; Bennet called Dorman by
his family name: Poppy. Bennett even lived with the Dornan family for six
years, but when Bennett disclosed he was gay, no dialogue was possible with the family and
the outcome was estrangement. Nevertheless, Bennett continues in the Republican Party.
Bennett does not believe that commitment to the gay cause is sacrificed by remaining in a
conservative party. Rather, he thinks change comes from within and continues to work in a
party whose leaders often openly denounce homosexuality.
Dongs film is not a diatribe on gay victimization. Instead the
focus is on families and the internecine conflicts that ensue when family members turn out
to be gay. The Los Angeles Times reported that Dong persuaded Bates College, in
Lewiston, Maine, to reschedule the screening of Family
Fundamentals from October 11 to a week earlier
Parents Day. Dong wants to focus
on the family and often, while interviewing gay people, he even reminds them that their
family loves them and waits for their responses. The interviewees seem a little taken
back, but finally reply that their families do love them, but that that love is
conditional, and does not accept their sexual orientation.
Family Fundamentals has moments of great poignancy and
insight. In interviews with Kathleen Bremmers anti-gay group, the interviewees
frequently paint gay people themselves as victims of the gay culture, claiming that it
does not allow them to leave its fold even if they wanted to. The Christian Rights
commiseration with gays who are allegedly ensnared by a virulent gay culture is a curious
twist, indeed.
In another remarkable interview, Brian Bennett describes how a talk
show discussion on Christianity encompassing gay love made him realize for the first time
that homosexuality may not be against his religion. As he says this, tears start running
down his cheeks and we understand that this was the moment of his epiphany. Bennett is one
of the smartest kids on the block and a seasoned politician, yet he always felt guilty
about the mismatch between his religion and his sexual orientation. Such is the power of
organized religion, and no one, not least people following alternate lifestyles are immune
from its influence.
- Nigam Nuggehalli