
...
home
| art & architecture | books & cds | dance
| destinations | film | opera | television | theater | archives
Suggested
reading: _______________________________________ |
||
|
||
.. |
Part of the problem is that the
movies central event is unsatisfactory as a story. Because the attack on Pearl
Harbor was only the opening salvo in Americas direct participation in World War II,
focusing a nearly three-hour movie on it is tantamount to building an epic around the
first line of The Iliad. The attacks
quickness and one-sided results scarcely allowed for individual tales of heroism to
emerge, so that the people directly affected by it have remained a strangely anonymous
group, largely remembered as half-dressed men running for their lives. (Only the image of
Dorie Miller, the black cook turned AA-gunner played here by Cuba Gooding, Jr., emerged
from the shrouds of history to grab the popular imagination.) And though the attack was
the bluntest foreign policy statement ever delivered between two countries, its greatest
drama lay in the diplomatic cat-and-mouse games leading up to it, and in the hopeful
desperation of those Japanese leaders who planned the assault despite their knowledge that
it would only awaken a sleeping giant.
Bay and screenwriter Randall
Wallace have tried to give the episode a commercially satisfying shape by grafting other
bits of actionthe Battle of Britain and General Doolittles air raid on
Tokyofore and aft of the big set piece. But these episodes are perfunctorily staged
(the Doolittle raid mainly appears to blow up unneeded portions of the Disney backlot),
and their function as filler is transparent. Bay and Wallace steer clear of the
storys political reefs wherever they can; America and Japans deteriorating
relations are mainly used to remind us that the attack is getting closer, closer, closer.
The movie is so determined not to offend anyone that it even avoids directly mentioning
Dorie Millers race; we first meet him in the middle of a boxing match with a much
larger (and whiter) opponent who can think of no more cutting epithet to hurl at him than cook.
The movie
devotes the vast majority of its running time to the supremely featherheaded love triangle
that dashing flyboys Ben Affleck (in a preening, arrogant performance) and Josh Hartnett
form with nurse Kate Beckinsale. The mens notions of masculinity and honor come
straight from Boys Life magazine; the nurse is spunky when shes on the job
(she even finds medical uses for her lipstick and nylons when the bombers hit), but
shes otherwise a passive vessel who sits still as the men tell her how
beautiful they think she is. Bay, perhaps the most emotionally empty director working
today, has no idea of what human beings look like, act like, or talk like. Hes
absolutely helpless when it comes to shooting dialogueevery conversation becomes a
monotonous series of alternating close-ups so huge that we feel like were about to
fall inside the actors mouths.
Pearl Harbor is riddled with
moonshine touches. The unendurable quaint first meeting between a tongue-tied Affleck and
a starchily amused Beckinsale is stretched into infinity by having Beckinsale recount it
in flashback for her fellow nurses. Later Affleck joins an American squadron of the RAF,
and in one loco shot Beckinsale sits prettily poised atop a rock, reading a love-letter
from him, oblivious to the pounding Hawaiian surf that threatens to tow her out to sea.
When FDR delivers inspiration to his discouraged generals by hoisting himself to his feet
from his wheelchair, the preposterous visual echo of Peter Sellers as Dr. Strangelove is
buttressed by our awareness that in Bays films the unreality of movies is the only
reality there is. A service-comedy barroom brawl ends unsurprisingly with the arrival of
billyclub-brandishing MPs; the Japanese Zeroes flitting about the harbor resemble the
gnat-like fighter pods in the Star Wars trilogy. Pearl
Harbor acts as if only a cynic could be less than enchanted by characterstwo of
them, no less!who self-consciously rehearse speeches they intend to give to their
lovers.
The big
attack sequence isnt as splintered as Bays action scenes in The Rock or Armageddonwe
can tell whats going on even if we have no idea where any of it is supposed to be
taking place. The torpedoes hanging from the bellies of the Japanese bombers look like
especially malevolent stingers, and cinematographer John Schwartzman brings out some
marvelous dusky tones from the smoke and wrenched metal in the aerial views of Battleship
Row. Yet the terrible majesty with which the U.S.S.
Arizona is blown apart at the seams is the only special effect that lingers in the
mind after the half-hour long attack sequence. Bay throws hundreds of images at us, but he
doesnt know how to invest them with gravity or poetry except in the most obvious
ways, as when he spackles Hans Zimmers ghastly choir music onto slow-motion views of
drowning sailors. The computer-generated effects are of a highly variable quality; the
worst of them, such as the destruction wreaked on the hospital when a nearby car explodes,
are enough to make you wish for the honest old days of Ray Harryhausen.
Late in the movie were told that
after the Doolittle raid
America knew nothing but victory, which is a
gallingly incomplete way of describing what happened at places like Guadalcanal, Tarawa,
Iwo Jima, and Okinawa. By downplaying Pearl Harbors social and political bite, and
by affixing that triumphant appendix to it, Bay has turned a dark and sorry event in world
history into the equivalent of a cinematic thrill-ride. The filmmakers who give us lavishly detailed
recreations of the Holocaust, D-Day, and the sinking of the Titanic might state
whatever high-minded intentions they wish to for the public record, but in their hearts
they know that audiences flock to their pictures at least partly for their necrotic
appeal. Michael Bay has given us a less gruesome movie than he might have, but as an
invitation to revel in the misdeeds of history, Pearl
Harbor still diminishes what happened on December 7, 1941. The fact that hes
piled on the requisite attitudes and buzzwordsvictory,
patriotism, and all the restdoesnt mean that the veterans of World
War II should automatically endorse the shrink-wrapping of their experiences into such a
blatantly commercial vehicle. It would make for one fine last piece of heroism if they
refused to do so.