

..
.home | art & architecture | books & cds | dance
| destinations | film | opera | television | theater | archives
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
As Christmas approaches,
paternal Torvald Helmer (Owen McDonnell) chides cheerful wife Nora (Hannah Yelland) for
spending too much money, even though he is to become manager of a reputable bank in the
new year. The chiding is gentle but firm and Noras response is respectful, though
she lies about the macaroons she has bought against his wishes and hidden in the piano. Is
this the extent of her rebellion? Are these the limits of her relationship with her
husband? Of course not. Unbeknownst to Torvald, Nora has taken out a private loan which
she has been slowly paying back. The lender, Krogstad (Phelim Drew) is a fallen soul who
works at her husbands bank, and when his job is threatened the secret act of
defiance (undertaken with honorable motives) could explode into the public eye.
When first performed in Norway in 1879, Ibsens meditation on
self-realization was an understandable sensation. It is essentially a tale of a woman who
comes to understand how she has been repressed by allowing others to define her: a doll in
a dolls house of a life. Her response is to find those small threads of self which
remain and draw them out. This leads her to leave her husband and to a search for reality
in the world outside. To audiences that would never hear the word feminism
even in their lifetime, this was cause for celebration or panic, depending on which side
of the argument you were on.
Ibsen claimed to be dumbfounded by the perception of his work as a
social tract, but it is hard to read this play any other way, and this is not necessarily
a good thing. Though the writing (Frank McGuinness) and directing (László Marton) team
which brought 2003s stunning The
Wild Duck have returned with another beautifully realized production, and though
in itself A Dolls House is a classic work of theatre, a political reading
is inescapable. On this level, what was radical in 1879 and arguably still cogent in 1979
is now prosaic. Though in itself a brilliantly written account of the tensions between
self and society, there are no real surprises here anymore. Good as the plotting and
characterization are, McGuinness linguistic smoothing of the hard contours of the
1960s Michael Myer translation makes the dialogue more palatable to the modern ear but
does not invigorate the text itself.
Thankfully there is some surprise in the production. Hannah
Yellands vivid, energetic interpretation of Nora literally brings the story to life.
Under Martons direction, she fills the stage with her presence and reaches every
part of it with her movements. Her Nora flits and flies about like a bird, for all the
world giving physical representation to Torvalds frequent descriptions of her as
"my skylark." This ceaseless movement is shown to have both a joyous and anxious
side, reaching a climax when Nora rehearses her Tarantella in a frantic bid to buy time
and stop her husband reading a letter from Krogstad which will reveal her secret. The
dance reveals a body in a state of high nervous tension bordering on panic, burning energy
and expressing uncertainty. After this, and most pronouncedly during the last scenes, she
assumes the deathly rigor of serious intention matching the other actors, whose stillness
throughout is notable. The shift in deportment is a mark of the characters inner
transformation, and Yelland conveys every detail with convincing precision.
Support from the rest of the cast is also good, but the deliberate
archness of the character of Torvald is likely to produce skeptical guffaws, as do one or
two other details and lines of dialogue which are past their best in terms of dramatic
effectiveness. This slightly dampens the exhilaration of seeing the play, but the
production itself is not at fault.
Dublin, April 21, 2005 - Harvey O'Brien