
..
.home | art & architecture | books & cds | dance
| destinations | film | opera | television | theater | archives
..
|
|
|
|
Twenty-five-year-old playwright Jordan Harrison was partially
inspired to write his new play, Finn in the Underworld, by the movie The Haunting, based on Shirley
Jacksons novel, The
Haunting of Hill House. The discomfort he creates for the audience is not based,
however, on B-grade horror- movie-style suspense, but, more cleverly, on the way he
manipulates reality, bends expectations, plays with time and moves actors in and out of
characters like ghosts.
Juxtaposing the secrets of one familys past with the
discomforting realities of a sexually transgressive young man and his need to shock and
risk, the narrative that results takes the audience on an unpredictable, claustrophobic
journey into some pretty sordid realities. Sexual activities which may have been
unthinkable onstage before the 60s may be fair game today, but arent exactly
enjoyable to watch. And while the audience becomes unsettled in the world Harrison
presents, the people onstage dont seems particularly comfortable with themselves
either. If it succeeds at all, Finn in the Underworld works as a sexual
shock-fest, not a thriller.
It is not even the characters that matter, as much as the mood, the creepiness gone
rampant at Grandmas house.
In the program notes, Harrison talks about how his tendency as a
playwright, so far anyway, is to let a play "fall apart" in pursuit of its
aesthetic goal. That is exactly what happens here, something only a very young playwright
would be willing to risk. When one of the (still active) main characters is announced to
be dead mid-way through the 90-minute work, reality begins to become less and less
important. Eventually, the play transforms itself into a kind of narrative free-for-all
with only the slightest connection to the original characters and story. It is unsettling,
to be sure. Harrison creates a David Lynchian bad-dream-state that never lets go.
The cast includes some veterans doing what they do serviceably, with
the exception of the kid, Finn, played by Clifton Guterman. Gutermans performance of
the wild-child is spot-on. His pout-faced gay-boy persona is also the only character
supplied with any depth; everyone else seems like a cardboard cutout. This play takes a
stab at some squirmy issues, using ghost-story cliches to attempt a level of suspense
that it never really earns. The set, it should be mentioned, closes in on the characters,
scene by scene, until the space left is very claustrophobic indeed.
Berkeley, October 11, 2005 - Michael Wade Simpson