One of the first scenes in Van Helsing is a fight between the title character (Hugh Jackman) and evil Mr. Hyde in a bell tower in Notre Dame Cathedral. During a break in the struggle, Mr. Hyde grabs his head and shouts, The bells! The bells! The character seems to realize that he is making a joke about The Hunchback of Notre Dame, and the rest of the film is laden with equally obvious references to classic horror movies. Sometimes the cinematic tributes achieve a memorable visual effect–as in the case of the costume ball based on the one in the original Phantom of the Opera–but mostly they are highlights of old monster flicks clumsily dropped into a lackluster action movie.
Based on the wily professor who battled Dracula in countless pictures, this Van Helsing is the top agent of an interfaith network of monster-killers operating out of the basement of the Vatican, circa 1895. Unable to remember his past, Van Helsing is sent by his superiors on a mission that promises to provide some clues about his identity. He must kill Dracula (Richard Roxburgh) before the Count tracks down Anna Valerious (Kate Beckinsale) and finishes off her family of vampire-hunters. It turns out that Dracula wants to use Dr. Frankensteins discoveries to give life to a vampire horde, and he also employs werewolves as servants, so thats how the other Universal monsters get into the act. The Mummy is left out of the story, but writer/director Stephen Sommers already visited Imhotep in 1999s The Mummy and 2001s The Mummy Returns.
Van Helsing is really more a James Bond movie than a horror film. The visit to the Vatican basement reveals a sort of Qs lab where clerics of all faiths work on the latest anti-monster technologies. Van Helsing gets his quota of new gadgets and they come in just as handy as 007s always do. The female characters further the Bond effect, being Eastern European babes (Beckinsales Anna and Draculas wives) with suitably exotic costumes and accents. Hugh Jackman does his best to make Van Helsing a tortured hero, but the dialogue doesnt give him much chance. When Anna asks his character if hes a holy man or a murderer, he responds that hes a bit of both. Its an obvious reply, and if you can say it without making the audience laugh, youre overachieving.
A more fundamental problem is that the computer-generated monsters arent really scary. Current computer technology has a hard time putting life in the eyes of its creatures, and the musculature usually ends up resembling claymation. (Thats why the least convincing monster in the film is Mr. Hyde, while the most plausible creatures are the hairy werewolves.) A lot of the action involves acrobatics at dizzying heights, but the humans uncanny ability to remain unhurt after slamming into trees and castle walls undercuts the scene-designers valiant efforts to induce fear of falling.
There are some clever twists on monster lore, including a theory about why vampires dont cast reflections (for them, mirrors are portals). Likewise, Kevin J. OConnors Igor is an enjoyable character, offering an amusing spin on Dr. Frankensteins evil henchman Fritz, who was played with abandon in 1931 by Universals go-to guy for evil henchmen, Dwight Frye. In a scene reminiscent of one involving Fritz and the Frankenstein monster, Igor wantonly torments a chained Wolf Man with a high-tech torch. When Dracula asks why he keeps doing that, Igor looks puzzled at the question and replies: Its what I do. The scene is a sharp but affectionate comment on the over-the-top underlings of old Universal monster films, but the other cinematic references dont achieve the same pitch.
Despite its many allusions to golden-age horror movies, Van Helsing more closely resembles the disappointing, overwrought monster rallies of the 1940s (House of Frankenstein, House of Dracula) than the subtle, chilling classics of the early 30s.
While the historical-clips-plus-talking-heads style of this documentary may be conventional, its subject was anything but: namely FLOTUS Lady Bird Johnson’s...